Environment details: White house TN
acceptable quality; local variances noted.
Environment details: Swansea MA
Poor water quality, local pollution issues.
Compare Environment: White house TN vs Swansea MA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | White house | Swansea |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 741 | 449 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | acceptable quality; local variances noted. | Poor water quality, local pollution issues. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.66 | 1.8 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 36 | 47 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: White house vs Swansea
- Water quality is rated higher in White house at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Swansea.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Swansea with an average index of 1.8 compared to 1.66 in White house.
- Swansea experiences more days with poor air quality at 47 compared to 36 in White house.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.