Demographics details for White house, TN vs Holiday, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in White house, TN vs Holiday, FL.
Data | White house | Holiday |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,516 | 21,495 |
Median Age | 36.5 years | 43.9 years |
Median Income | $85,404 | $40,852 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: White house vs Holiday
- The population in Holiday is higher at 21,495, compared to 14,516 in White house.
- The median age in Holiday is higher at 43.9 years, compared to 36.5 years in White house.
- White house has a higher median income of $85,404 compared to $40,852 in Holiday.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in White house at 46.0% compared to 31.0% in Holiday.
- The poverty level is higher in Holiday at 13%, compared to 7% in White house.
- The unemployment rate in White house is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Holiday.
Demographics
Demographics White house vs Holiday provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | White house | Holiday |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 9 |
White | 87 | 61 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: White house vs Holiday
- In Holiday, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in White house.
- White house has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 61% in Holiday.
- Both White house and Holiday have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Holiday has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 4% in White house.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Holiday at 11%, compared to 6% in White house.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both White house and Holiday at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | White house | Holiday |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 13.7% |
Depression | 27.6% | 24.5% |
Smoking | 17.7% | 27.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 33.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: White house vs Holiday
- In Holiday, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.5% in White house.
- Depression is more prevalent in White house at 27.6% compared to 24.5% in Holiday.
- Holiday has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 17.7% in White house.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Holiday at 16.9% compared to 16.7% in White house.
- Holiday has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 32.5% in White house.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Holiday at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in White house.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | White house | Holiday |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 1.0% (217) |
High School Diploma | 18.0% (2,617) | 34.2% (7,351) |
Less than High School | 12.4% (1,794) | 15.3% (3,281) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (2,235) | 8.5% (1,817) |
Education Levels Comparison: White house vs Holiday
- In Holiday, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in White house.
- In Holiday, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.2% compared to 18.0% in White house.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Holiday at 15.3%, compared to 12.4% in White house.
- A higher percentage of residents in White house hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 8.5% in Holiday.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.