Demographics details for White house, TN vs Chauncey, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in White house, TN vs Chauncey, OH.
| Data | White house | Chauncey |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,516 | 949 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 45.9 years |
| Median Income | $85,404 | $33,803 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: White house vs Chauncey
- In White house, the population is higher at 14,516, compared to 949 in Chauncey.
- The median age in Chauncey is higher at 45.9 years, compared to 36.5 years in White house.
- White house has a higher median income of $85,404 compared to $33,803 in Chauncey.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in White house at 46.0% compared to 24.0% in Chauncey.
- The poverty level is higher in Chauncey at 12%, compared to 7% in White house.
- Chauncey has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in White house.
Demographics
Demographics White house vs Chauncey provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | White house | Chauncey |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 99 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: White house vs Chauncey
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in White house at 2% compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chauncey at 99% compared to 87% in White house.
- The Asian population is larger in White house at 1% compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- The Hispanic community is larger in White house at 4% compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- More residents identify as two or more races in White house at 6% compared to 1% in Chauncey.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both White house and Chauncey at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | White house | Chauncey |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 28.3% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: White house vs Chauncey
- In Chauncey, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.5% in White house.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chauncey at 28.3% versus 27.6% in White house.
- Chauncey has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 17.7% in White house.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chauncey at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in White house.
- Chauncey has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 32.5% in White house.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chauncey at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in White house.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | White house | Chauncey |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 1.5% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 18.0% (2,617) | 27.6% (262) |
| Less than High School | 12.4% (1,794) | 19.9% (189) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (2,235) | 7.1% (67) |
Education Levels Comparison: White house vs Chauncey
- In Chauncey, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in White house.
- In Chauncey, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 18.0% in White house.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chauncey at 19.9%, compared to 12.4% in White house.
- A higher percentage of residents in White house hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 7.1% in Chauncey.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.