Demographics details for White house, TN vs Aurora, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in White house, TN vs Aurora, IL.
| Data | White house | Aurora |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,516 | 177,866 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $85,404 | $85,943 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: White house vs Aurora
- The population in Aurora is higher at 177,866, compared to 14,516 in White house.
- Residents in White house have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 35.4 years in Aurora.
- Aurora has a higher median income of $85,943, compared to $85,404 in White house.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in White house at 46.0% compared to 38.0% in Aurora.
- The poverty level is higher in Aurora at 12%, compared to 7% in White house.
- Aurora has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.4% in White house.
Demographics
Demographics White house vs Aurora provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | White house | Aurora |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 11 |
| White | 87 | 17 |
| Asian | 1 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 43 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: White house vs Aurora
- In Aurora, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 2% in White house.
- White house has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 17% in Aurora.
- In Aurora, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in White house.
- Aurora has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 4% in White house.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Aurora at 17%, compared to 6% in White house.
- In Aurora, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in White house.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | White house | Aurora |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: White house vs Aurora
- More residents in White house report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.0% in Aurora.
- Depression is more prevalent in White house at 27.6% compared to 17.8% in Aurora.
- Smoking is more prevalent in White house at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Aurora.
- Binge drinking is more common in White house at 16.7% compared to 15.8% in Aurora.
- Aurora has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 32.5% in White house.
- Disability percentages are higher in White house at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Aurora.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | White house | Aurora |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 2.4% (4,323) |
| High School Diploma | 18.0% (2,617) | 11.5% (20,384) |
| Less than High School | 12.4% (1,794) | 22.9% (40,725) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (2,235) | 22.7% (40,403) |
Education Levels Comparison: White house vs Aurora
- In Aurora, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.2% in White house.
- A higher percentage of residents in White house hold a high school diploma at 18.0% compared to 11.5% in Aurora.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aurora at 22.9%, compared to 12.4% in White house.
- In Aurora, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 15.4% in White house.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.