Demographics details for Wheeling, WV vs Meadville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wheeling, WV vs Meadville, PA.
| Data | Wheeling | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,391 | 12,680 |
| Median Age | 45.0 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,516 | $46,157 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Wheeling vs Meadville
- In Wheeling, the population is higher at 26,391, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- Residents in Wheeling have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Wheeling has a higher median income of $46,516 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wheeling at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- Wheeling has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.1% in Wheeling.
Demographics
Demographics Wheeling vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wheeling | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 5 |
| White | 90 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wheeling vs Meadville
- In Meadville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Wheeling.
- Wheeling has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 86% in Meadville.
- Both Wheeling and Meadville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Meadville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Wheeling.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meadville at 6%, compared to 4% in Wheeling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wheeling and Meadville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wheeling | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 40.4% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wheeling vs Meadville
- More residents in Wheeling report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 19.2% in Meadville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wheeling at 28.7% compared to 26.6% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 21.0% in Wheeling.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Meadville at 16.6% compared to 14.4% in Wheeling.
- Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 40.4% in Wheeling.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in Wheeling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wheeling | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (130) | 0.2% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (5,888) | 24.5% (3,110) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (2,653) | 8.6% (1,085) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.5% (6,209) | 15.4% (1,953) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wheeling vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of residents in Wheeling have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 22.3% in Wheeling.
- More residents in Wheeling have less than a high school education at 10.1% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wheeling hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.5% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.