Demographics details for Wheatland, CA vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wheatland, CA vs Ash fork, AZ.
| Data | Wheatland | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,789 | 466 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $76,991 | $79,861 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Wheatland vs Ash fork
- In Wheatland, the population is higher at 3,789, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- Residents in Wheatland have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 38.6 years in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861, compared to $76,991 in Wheatland.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 43.0% in Wheatland.
- The poverty level is higher in Ash fork at 10%, compared to 9% in Wheatland.
- Ash fork has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.6% in Wheatland.
Demographics
Demographics Wheatland vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wheatland | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wheatland vs Ash fork
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Wheatland and Ash fork at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ash fork at 79% compared to 69% in Wheatland.
- The Asian population is larger in Wheatland at 2% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wheatland at 19% compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ash fork at 15%, compared to 10% in Wheatland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wheatland and Ash fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wheatland | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 30.3% | 30.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wheatland vs Ash fork
- In Ash fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.4% in Wheatland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ash fork at 21.4% versus 20.5% in Wheatland.
- Ash fork has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 12.7% in Wheatland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wheatland at 18.4% compared to 15.9% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has higher obesity rates at 30.6% compared to 30.3% in Wheatland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 12.0% in Wheatland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wheatland | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (42) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (518) | 13.1% (61) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (412) | 23.6% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (539) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wheatland vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Wheatland have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wheatland hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 10.9% in Wheatland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wheatland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.