Demographics details for Weyers cave, VA vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Weyers cave, VA vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data Weyers cave Massapequa park
Population 2,212 16,873
Median Age 26.6 years 43.7 years
Median Income $93,384 $161,193
Married Families 39.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 8% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Weyers cave vs Massapequa park

  • The population in Massapequa park is higher at 16,873, compared to 2,212 in Weyers cave.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 26.6 years in Weyers cave.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $93,384 in Weyers cave.
  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 39.0% in Weyers cave.
  • Weyers cave has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Weyers cave.

Demographics

Demographics Weyers cave vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Weyers cave Massapequa park
Black 7 1
White 80 88
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 8 5
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Weyers cave vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Weyers cave at 7% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to 80% in Weyers cave.
  • In Massapequa park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Weyers cave.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Weyers cave at 8% compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Weyers cave at 5% compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Weyers cave and Massapequa park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Weyers cave Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 8.0%
Depression 23.6% 17.9%
Smoking 14.8% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 18.6% 19.2%
Obesity 34.2% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 4.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Weyers cave vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in Weyers cave report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Weyers cave at 23.6% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Weyers cave at 14.8% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Weyers cave.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Weyers cave at 34.2% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Massapequa park at 9.0% compared to 4.0% in Weyers cave.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Weyers cave Massapequa park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 15.5% (342) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 3.0% (66) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.2% (580) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: Weyers cave vs Massapequa park

  • In Massapequa park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Weyers cave.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Weyers cave hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Massapequa park at 3.8%, compared to 3.0% in Weyers cave.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 26.2% in Weyers cave.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.