Demographics details for Westminster, MD vs Stanardsville, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Westminster, MD vs Stanardsville, VA.

Data Westminster Stanardsville
Population 20,393 355
Median Age 37.3 years 42.2 years
Median Income $71,286 $60,833
Married Families 37.0% 54.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Westminster vs Stanardsville

  • In Westminster, the population is higher at 20,393, compared to 355 in Stanardsville.
  • The median age in Stanardsville is higher at 42.2 years, compared to 37.3 years in Westminster.
  • Westminster has a higher median income of $71,286 compared to $60,833 in Stanardsville.
  • In Stanardsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 37.0% in Westminster.
  • The poverty level is higher in Stanardsville at 10%, compared to 5% in Westminster.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Westminster and Stanardsville at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Westminster vs Stanardsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Westminster Stanardsville
Black 7 12
White 77 64
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 11
Two or More Races 7 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Westminster vs Stanardsville

  • In Stanardsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 7% in Westminster.
  • Westminster has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 64% in Stanardsville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Westminster at 3% compared to 0% in Stanardsville.
  • Stanardsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 6% in Westminster.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stanardsville at 13%, compared to 7% in Westminster.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Westminster and Stanardsville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Westminster Stanardsville
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 9.2% 12.0%
Depression 20.8% 24.1%
Smoking 13.6% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 16.5%
Obesity 32.4% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Westminster vs Stanardsville

  • In Stanardsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.3% in Westminster.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Stanardsville at 24.1% versus 20.8% in Westminster.
  • Stanardsville has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 13.6% in Westminster.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Westminster at 17.5% compared to 16.5% in Stanardsville.
  • Stanardsville has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 32.4% in Westminster.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stanardsville at 23.0% compared to 16.0% in Westminster.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Westminster Stanardsville
No Schooling 0.7% (137) 8.7% (31)
High School Diploma 16.2% (3,301) 27.9% (99)
Less than High School 13.1% (2,677) 28.7% (102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.5% (4,789) 27.6% (98)

Education Levels Comparison: Westminster vs Stanardsville

  • In Stanardsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 8.7% compared to 0.7% in Westminster.
  • In Stanardsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 16.2% in Westminster.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stanardsville at 28.7%, compared to 13.1% in Westminster.
  • In Stanardsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.6% compared to 23.5% in Westminster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.