Demographics details for Westminster, MD vs Potts camp, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Westminster, MD vs Potts camp, MS.
| Data | Westminster | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,393 | 409 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 45.6 years |
| Median Income | $71,286 | $21,845 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Westminster vs Potts camp
- In Westminster, the population is higher at 20,393, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
- The median age in Potts camp is higher at 45.6 years, compared to 37.3 years in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $71,286 compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Westminster at 37.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
- The poverty level is higher in Potts camp at 25%, compared to 5% in Westminster.
- Potts camp has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Westminster.
Demographics
Demographics Westminster vs Potts camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Westminster | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 13 |
| White | 77 | 80 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Westminster vs Potts camp
- In Potts camp, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 7% in Westminster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Potts camp at 80% compared to 77% in Westminster.
- The Asian population is larger in Westminster at 3% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Westminster at 6% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- Both Westminster and Potts camp have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Westminster and Potts camp at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Westminster | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Westminster vs Potts camp
- In Potts camp, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.3% in Westminster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Potts camp at 23.0% versus 20.8% in Westminster.
- Potts camp has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 13.6% in Westminster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Westminster at 17.5% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
- Potts camp has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 32.4% in Westminster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Potts camp at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Westminster | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (137) | 0.5% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (3,301) | 13.7% (56) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,677) | 12.0% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.5% (4,789) | 8.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Westminster vs Potts camp
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
- More residents in Westminster have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 12.0% in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.5% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.