Demographics details for Westminster, MD vs Grafton, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Westminster, MD vs Grafton, WI.
| Data | Westminster | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,393 | 12,433 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 43.8 years |
| Median Income | $71,286 | $83,500 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Westminster vs Grafton
- In Westminster, the population is higher at 20,393, compared to 12,433 in Grafton.
- The median age in Grafton is higher at 43.8 years, compared to 37.3 years in Westminster.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500, compared to $71,286 in Westminster.
- In Grafton, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 37.0% in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 4% in Grafton.
- The unemployment rate in Westminster is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Westminster vs Grafton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Westminster | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 2 |
| White | 77 | 87 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Westminster vs Grafton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Westminster at 7% compared to 2% in Grafton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grafton at 87% compared to 77% in Westminster.
- The Asian population is larger in Westminster at 3% compared to 2% in Grafton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Westminster at 6% compared to 4% in Grafton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Westminster at 7% compared to 5% in Grafton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Westminster and Grafton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Westminster | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 11.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 25.5% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Westminster vs Grafton
- More residents in Westminster report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grafton at 21.0% versus 20.8% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Westminster at 13.6% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 17.5% in Westminster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Westminster at 32.4% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Westminster at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Westminster | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (137) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (3,301) | 12.9% (1,600) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,677) | 3.1% (384) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.5% (4,789) | 31.8% (3,959) |
Education Levels Comparison: Westminster vs Grafton
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 12.9% in Grafton.
- More residents in Westminster have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- In Grafton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 23.5% in Westminster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.