Demographics details for Westminster, CO vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Westminster, CO vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Westminster | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 114,533 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $90,651 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Westminster vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 114,533 in Westminster.
- Residents in Westminster have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $90,651 compared to $79,085 in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Westminster at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- The poverty level is higher in Tacoma at 11%, compared to 9% in Westminster.
- Tacoma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.1% in Westminster.
Demographics
Demographics Westminster vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Westminster | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 11 |
| White | 58 | 53 |
| Asian | 5 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Westminster vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 1% in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 5% in Westminster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Westminster at 24% compared to 12% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 11% in Westminster.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Westminster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Westminster | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 26.9% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Westminster vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Westminster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 21.1% in Westminster.
- Tacoma has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 13.5% in Westminster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Westminster at 21.5% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 26.9% in Westminster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Westminster | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,007) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (13,626) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (11,853) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.3% (34,676) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Westminster vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.9% in Westminster.
- In Tacoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 11.9% in Westminster.
- More residents in Westminster have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 23.0% in Tacoma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.