Demographics details for Westminster, CO vs Sulphur, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Westminster, CO vs Sulphur, LA.
| Data | Westminster | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 114,533 | 20,342 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $90,651 | $53,606 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Westminster vs Sulphur
- In Westminster, the population is higher at 114,533, compared to 20,342 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Sulphur is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 37.4 years in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $90,651 compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Westminster at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Sulphur.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur at 15%, compared to 9% in Westminster.
- Sulphur has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Westminster.
Demographics
Demographics Westminster vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Westminster | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 9 |
| White | 58 | 83 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Westminster vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Westminster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sulphur at 83% compared to 58% in Westminster.
- The Asian population is larger in Westminster at 5% compared to 1% in Sulphur.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Westminster at 24% compared to 5% in Sulphur.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Westminster at 11% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Westminster at 1% compared to 0% in Sulphur.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Westminster | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 28.7% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 26.9% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Westminster vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.2% in Westminster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur at 28.7% versus 21.1% in Westminster.
- Sulphur has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 13.5% in Westminster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Westminster at 21.5% compared to 20.6% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 26.9% in Westminster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Westminster | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,007) | 0.5% (93) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (13,626) | 24.2% (4,925) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (11,853) | 19.3% (3,918) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.3% (34,676) | 11.7% (2,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Westminster vs Sulphur
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Sulphur.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.2% compared to 11.9% in Westminster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 19.3%, compared to 10.3% in Westminster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 11.7% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.