Demographics details for Westminster, CA vs Southlake, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Westminster, CA vs Southlake, TX.
| Data | Westminster | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 89,397 | 31,102 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $80,271 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Westminster vs Southlake
- In Westminster, the population is higher at 89,397, compared to 31,102 in Southlake.
- The median age in Southlake is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 41.6 years in Westminster.
- Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $80,271 in Westminster.
- In Southlake, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 43.0% in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Southlake.
- The unemployment rate in Westminster is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.0% in Southlake.
Demographics
Demographics Westminster vs Southlake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Westminster | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 16 | 68 |
| Asian | 51 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Westminster vs Southlake
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Westminster and Southlake at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Southlake at 68% compared to 16% in Westminster.
- The Asian population is larger in Westminster at 51% compared to 17% in Southlake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Westminster at 24% compared to 9% in Southlake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Westminster at 8% compared to 5% in Southlake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Westminster and Southlake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Westminster | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 7.2% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 23.4% | 27.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Westminster vs Southlake
- More residents in Westminster report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 12.8% in Southlake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Southlake at 21.3% versus 15.3% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Westminster at 12.5% compared to 8.4% in Southlake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Southlake at 19.4% compared to 13.0% in Westminster.
- Southlake has higher obesity rates at 27.1% compared to 23.4% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Westminster at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Southlake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Westminster | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.5% (4,006) | 0.0% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (14,303) | 4.2% (1,302) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (19,217) | 1.3% (392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (16,558) | 46.0% (14,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Westminster vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.0% in Southlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 4.2% in Southlake.
- More residents in Westminster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 1.3% in Southlake.
- In Southlake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 18.5% in Westminster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.