Demographics details for Westminster, CA vs Powhatan, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Westminster, CA vs Powhatan, VA.
| Data | Westminster | Powhatan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 89,397 | 31,489 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 45.6 years |
| Median Income | $80,271 | $108,089 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Westminster vs Powhatan
- In Westminster, the population is higher at 89,397, compared to 31,489 in Powhatan.
- The median age in Powhatan is higher at 45.6 years, compared to 41.6 years in Westminster.
- Powhatan has a higher median income of $108,089, compared to $80,271 in Westminster.
- In Powhatan, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 43.0% in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 4% in Powhatan.
- The unemployment rate in Westminster is higher at 4.4%, compared to 2.6% in Powhatan.
Demographics
Demographics Westminster vs Powhatan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Westminster | Powhatan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 9 |
| White | 16 | 85 |
| Asian | 51 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 24 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Westminster vs Powhatan
- In Powhatan, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Westminster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Powhatan at 85% compared to 16% in Westminster.
- The Asian population is larger in Westminster at 51% compared to 0% in Powhatan.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Westminster at 24% compared to 2% in Powhatan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Westminster at 8% compared to 4% in Powhatan.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Westminster and Powhatan at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Westminster | Powhatan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 14.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 19.9% |
| Obesity | 23.4% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Westminster vs Powhatan
- In Powhatan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.9% in Westminster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Powhatan at 22.9% versus 15.3% in Westminster.
- Powhatan has a higher smoking rate at 14.2% compared to 12.5% in Westminster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Powhatan at 19.9% compared to 13.0% in Westminster.
- Powhatan has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 23.4% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Westminster at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Powhatan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Westminster | Powhatan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.5% (4,006) | 0.6% (182) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (14,303) | 15.0% (4,711) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (19,217) | 10.5% (3,300) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (16,558) | 23.9% (7,526) |
Education Levels Comparison: Westminster vs Powhatan
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.6% in Powhatan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Powhatan.
- More residents in Westminster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 10.5% in Powhatan.
- In Powhatan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.9% compared to 18.5% in Westminster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.