Demographics details for Westminster, CA vs Giddings, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Westminster, CA vs Giddings, TX.
| Data | Westminster | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 89,397 | 5,129 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $80,271 | $63,529 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Westminster vs Giddings
- In Westminster, the population is higher at 89,397, compared to 5,129 in Giddings.
- Residents in Westminster have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 40.2 years in Giddings.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $80,271 compared to $63,529 in Giddings.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Westminster at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Giddings.
- Westminster has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Giddings.
- Giddings has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.4% in Westminster.
Demographics
Demographics Westminster vs Giddings provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Westminster | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 11 |
| White | 16 | 24 |
| Asian | 51 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 48 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Westminster vs Giddings
- In Giddings, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 1% in Westminster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Giddings at 24% compared to 16% in Westminster.
- The Asian population is larger in Westminster at 51% compared to 1% in Giddings.
- Giddings has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 24% in Westminster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Giddings at 12%, compared to 8% in Westminster.
- In Giddings, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Westminster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Westminster | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 23.4% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Westminster vs Giddings
- In Giddings, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.9% in Westminster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Giddings at 23.2% versus 15.3% in Westminster.
- Giddings has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 12.5% in Westminster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Giddings at 16.8% compared to 13.0% in Westminster.
- Giddings has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 23.4% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Westminster at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Giddings.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Westminster | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.5% (4,006) | 1.0% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (14,303) | 26.1% (1,341) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (19,217) | 22.3% (1,143) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (16,558) | 8.8% (453) |
Education Levels Comparison: Westminster vs Giddings
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 1.0% in Giddings.
- In Giddings, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 16.0% in Westminster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Giddings at 22.3%, compared to 21.5% in Westminster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Westminster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 8.8% in Giddings.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.