Demographics details for Westerville, OH vs Big sky, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Westerville, OH vs Big sky, MT.
Data | Westerville | Big sky |
---|---|---|
Population | 38,466 | 2,825 |
Median Age | 40.8 years | 37.2 years |
Median Income | $103,617 | $94,176 |
Married Families | 49.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Westerville vs Big sky
- In Westerville, the population is higher at 38,466, compared to 2,825 in Big sky.
- Residents in Westerville have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 37.2 years in Big sky.
- Westerville has a higher median income of $103,617 compared to $94,176 in Big sky.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Westerville at 49.0% compared to 43.0% in Big sky.
- The poverty level is higher in Big sky at 5%, compared to 0% in Westerville.
- The unemployment rate in Westerville is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.5% in Big sky.
Demographics
Demographics Westerville vs Big sky provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Westerville | Big sky |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | Data is updating |
White | 82 | 85 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Westerville vs Big sky
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Westerville at 7% compared to 0% in Big sky.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Big sky at 85% compared to 82% in Westerville.
- The Asian population is larger in Westerville at 3% compared to 0% in Big sky.
- Big sky has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Westerville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Westerville at 6% compared to 2% in Big sky.
- In Big sky, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Westerville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Westerville | Big sky |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 12.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Depression | 23.3% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 13.5% | 10.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 24.3% |
Obesity | 33.3% | 24.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Westerville vs Big sky
- More residents in Westerville report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 12.8% in Big sky.
- Depression is more prevalent in Westerville at 23.3% compared to 20.6% in Big sky.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Westerville at 13.5% compared to 10.7% in Big sky.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Big sky at 24.3% compared to 19.7% in Westerville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Westerville at 33.3% compared to 24.1% in Big sky.
- Disability percentages are higher in Westerville at 9.0% compared to 5.0% in Big sky.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Westerville | Big sky |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (131) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 9.9% (3,815) | 10.1% (284) |
Less than High School | 2.5% (972) | 4.2% (118) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.3% (15,513) | 44.6% (1,261) |
Education Levels Comparison: Westerville vs Big sky
- A higher percentage of residents in Westerville have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Big sky.
- In Big sky, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.1% compared to 9.9% in Westerville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Big sky at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Westerville.
- In Big sky, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 40.3% in Westerville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.