Demographics details for West union, SC vs Gardner, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in West union, SC vs Gardner, MA.
Data | West union | Gardner |
---|---|---|
Population | 381 | 20,902 |
Median Age | 33.2 years | 45.0 years |
Median Income | $46,875 | $56,974 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: West union vs Gardner
- The population in Gardner is higher at 20,902, compared to 381 in West union.
- The median age in Gardner is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 33.2 years in West union.
- Gardner has a higher median income of $56,974, compared to $46,875 in West union.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in West union at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- West union has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Gardner.
- The unemployment rate in West union is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.6% in Gardner.
Demographics
Demographics West union vs Gardner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | West union | Gardner |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 2 |
White | 57 | 82 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 19 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: West union vs Gardner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in West union at 6% compared to 2% in Gardner.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gardner at 82% compared to 57% in West union.
- In Gardner, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in West union.
- The Hispanic community is larger in West union at 19% compared to 8% in Gardner.
- More residents identify as two or more races in West union at 18% compared to 5% in Gardner.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both West union and Gardner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | West union | Gardner |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 11.1% |
Depression | 24.4% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 22.0% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: West union vs Gardner
- More residents in West union report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.7% in Gardner.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.4%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in West union at 22.0% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 17.4% in West union.
- Obesity rates are higher in West union at 37.2% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- Disability percentages are higher in West union at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Gardner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | West union | Gardner |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (3) | 1.3% (276) |
High School Diploma | 17.3% (66) | 21.5% (4,487) |
Less than High School | 14.7% (56) | 16.8% (3,513) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (41) | 15.0% (3,133) |
Education Levels Comparison: West union vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.8% in West union.
- In Gardner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 17.3% in West union.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardner at 16.8%, compared to 14.7% in West union.
- In Gardner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 10.8% in West union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.