Demographics details for West mifflin, PA vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in West mifflin, PA vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | West mifflin | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,140 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $64,314 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: West mifflin vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 19,140 in West mifflin.
- Residents in West mifflin have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $64,314 in West mifflin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in West mifflin at 38.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 9% in West mifflin.
- Gallatin has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.2% in West mifflin.
Demographics
Demographics West mifflin vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | West mifflin | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 15 |
| White | 82 | 67 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: West mifflin vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 11% in West mifflin.
- West mifflin has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in West mifflin.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in West mifflin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 4% in West mifflin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both West mifflin and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | West mifflin | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: West mifflin vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in West mifflin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 23.0% in West mifflin.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 20.0% in West mifflin.
- Binge drinking is more common in West mifflin at 21.2% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 33.9% in West mifflin.
- Disability percentages are higher in West mifflin at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | West mifflin | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (75) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (4,884) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (1,377) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (3,199) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: West mifflin vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in West mifflin.
- A higher percentage of residents in West mifflin hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 7.2% in West mifflin.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 16.7% in West mifflin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.