Demographics details for West memphis, AR vs Forest, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in West memphis, AR vs Forest, MS.
Data | West memphis | Forest |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,795 | 5,330 |
Median Age | 33.3 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $40,904 | $50,093 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: West memphis vs Forest
- In West memphis, the population is higher at 23,795, compared to 5,330 in Forest.
- The median age in Forest is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 33.3 years in West memphis.
- Forest has a higher median income of $50,093, compared to $40,904 in West memphis.
- In Forest, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 23.0% in West memphis.
- West memphis has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 18% in Forest.
- The unemployment rate in West memphis is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.5% in Forest.
Demographics
Demographics West memphis vs Forest provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | West memphis | Forest |
---|---|---|
Black | 64 | 43 |
White | 29 | 24 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: West memphis vs Forest
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in West memphis at 64% compared to 43% in Forest.
- West memphis has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 24% in Forest.
- The Asian population is larger in West memphis at 1% compared to 0% in Forest.
- Forest has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 2% in West memphis.
- More residents identify as two or more races in West memphis at 4% compared to 3% in Forest.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both West memphis and Forest at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | West memphis | Forest |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.8% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.8% |
Depression | 25.7% | 21.2% |
Smoking | 28.0% | 26.1% |
Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 11.8% |
Obesity | 46.3% | 45.7% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: West memphis vs Forest
- More residents in West memphis report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 18.9% in Forest.
- Depression is more prevalent in West memphis at 25.7% compared to 21.2% in Forest.
- Smoking is more prevalent in West memphis at 28.0% compared to 26.1% in Forest.
- Binge drinking is more common in West memphis at 12.5% compared to 11.8% in Forest.
- Obesity rates are higher in West memphis at 46.3% compared to 45.7% in Forest.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in West memphis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | West memphis | Forest |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (204) | 4.4% (232) |
High School Diploma | 21.7% (5,162) | 10.5% (557) |
Less than High School | 13.0% (3,096) | 33.4% (1,779) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (2,236) | 8.5% (455) |
Education Levels Comparison: West memphis vs Forest
- In Forest, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.4% compared to 0.9% in West memphis.
- A higher percentage of residents in West memphis hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 10.5% in Forest.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest at 33.4%, compared to 13.0% in West memphis.
- A higher percentage of residents in West memphis hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.4% compared to 8.5% in Forest.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.