Demographics details for West columbia, SC vs Freeland, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in West columbia, SC vs Freeland, MI.
Data | West columbia | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,618 | 7,357 |
Median Age | 37.3 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $52,648 | $95,478 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: West columbia vs Freeland
- In West columbia, the population is higher at 17,618, compared to 7,357 in Freeland.
- The median age in Freeland is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 37.3 years in West columbia.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $95,478, compared to $52,648 in West columbia.
- In Freeland, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in West columbia.
- West columbia has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 4% in Freeland.
- The unemployment rate in West columbia is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Freeland.
Demographics
Demographics West columbia vs Freeland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | West columbia | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 9 |
White | 59 | 76 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 11 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: West columbia vs Freeland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in West columbia at 18% compared to 9% in Freeland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Freeland at 76% compared to 59% in West columbia.
- The Asian population is larger in West columbia at 3% compared to 1% in Freeland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in West columbia at 11% compared to 5% in Freeland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in West columbia at 9% compared to 8% in Freeland.
- In Freeland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in West columbia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | West columbia | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 9.1% |
Depression | 23.3% | 20.4% |
Smoking | 19.0% | 14.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 20.3% |
Obesity | 40.2% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: West columbia vs Freeland
- More residents in West columbia report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.5% in Freeland.
- Depression is more prevalent in West columbia at 23.3% compared to 20.4% in Freeland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in West columbia at 19.0% compared to 14.2% in Freeland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeland at 20.3% compared to 16.6% in West columbia.
- Obesity rates are higher in West columbia at 40.2% compared to 37.8% in Freeland.
- Disability percentages are higher in West columbia at 15.0% compared to 4.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | West columbia | Freeland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (77) | 0.7% (51) |
High School Diploma | 16.4% (2,891) | 13.8% (1,014) |
Less than High School | 12.4% (2,185) | 7.4% (542) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.1% (4,593) | 21.8% (1,605) |
Education Levels Comparison: West columbia vs Freeland
- In Freeland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in West columbia.
- A higher percentage of residents in West columbia hold a high school diploma at 16.4% compared to 13.8% in Freeland.
- More residents in West columbia have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 7.4% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in West columbia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 21.8% in Freeland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.