Demographics details for Wellington, FL vs Burns, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wellington, FL vs Burns, KS.
| Data | Wellington | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,438 | 237 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 26.5 years |
| Median Income | $105,848 | $43,125 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Wellington vs Burns
- In Wellington, the population is higher at 61,438, compared to 237 in Burns.
- Residents in Wellington have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 26.5 years in Burns.
- Wellington has a higher median income of $105,848 compared to $43,125 in Burns.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wellington at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Burns.
- The poverty level is higher in Burns at 14%, compared to 8% in Wellington.
- The unemployment rate in Wellington is higher at 3.3%, compared to 2.6% in Burns.
Demographics
Demographics Wellington vs Burns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wellington | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 42 | 92 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wellington vs Burns
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wellington at 11% compared to 0% in Burns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burns at 92% compared to 42% in Wellington.
- The Asian population is larger in Wellington at 5% compared to 0% in Burns.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wellington at 27% compared to 6% in Burns.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wellington at 15% compared to 2% in Burns.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wellington and Burns at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wellington | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 17.2% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 24.0% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wellington vs Burns
- In Burns, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.1% in Wellington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burns at 21.2% versus 17.2% in Wellington.
- Burns has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 13.9% in Wellington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burns at 19.2% compared to 16.7% in Wellington.
- Burns has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 24.0% in Wellington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burns at 23.0% compared to 9.0% in Wellington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wellington | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (431) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (6,304) | 13.9% (33) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (4,234) | 43.0% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.5% (19,977) | 6.3% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wellington vs Burns
- A higher percentage of residents in Wellington have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Burns.
- In Burns, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 10.3% in Wellington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burns at 43.0%, compared to 6.9% in Wellington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wellington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.5% compared to 6.3% in Burns.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.