Demographics details for Webb city, MO vs Earl park, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Webb city, MO vs Earl park, IN.
Data | Webb city | Earl park |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,165 | 362 |
Median Age | 34.2 years | 50.6 years |
Median Income | $58,964 | $62,750 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Webb city vs Earl park
- In Webb city, the population is higher at 13,165, compared to 362 in Earl park.
- The median age in Earl park is higher at 50.6 years, compared to 34.2 years in Webb city.
- Earl park has a higher median income of $62,750, compared to $58,964 in Webb city.
- In Earl park, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Webb city.
- Webb city has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Earl park.
- The unemployment rate in Webb city is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Earl park.
Demographics
Demographics Webb city vs Earl park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Webb city | Earl park |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 87 | 89 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Webb city vs Earl park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Webb city at 2% compared to 1% in Earl park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Earl park at 89% compared to 87% in Webb city.
- The Asian population is larger in Webb city at 2% compared to 0% in Earl park.
- Earl park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Webb city.
- Both Webb city and Earl park have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Webb city at 1% compared to 0% in Earl park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Webb city | Earl park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 13.8% |
Depression | 26.8% | 28.0% |
Smoking | 21.8% | 24.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 41.7% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Webb city vs Earl park
- More residents in Webb city report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 19.1% in Earl park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Earl park at 28.0% versus 26.8% in Webb city.
- Earl park has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 21.8% in Webb city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Earl park at 16.9% compared to 16.2% in Webb city.
- Earl park has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 40.0% in Webb city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Earl park at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in Webb city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Webb city | Earl park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (53) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.4% (2,556) | 21.5% (78) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (1,529) | 11.6% (42) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.5% (2,301) | 8.8% (32) |
Education Levels Comparison: Webb city vs Earl park
- A higher percentage of residents in Webb city have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Earl park.
- In Earl park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 19.4% in Webb city.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 11.6%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Webb city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.5% compared to 8.8% in Earl park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.