Demographics details for Weatherford, OK vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Weatherford, OK vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Weatherford Sterling heights
Population 11,859 132,567
Median Age 23.9 years 41.2 years
Median Income $47,851 $75,381
Married Families 28.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 15% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Weatherford vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 11,859 in Weatherford.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 23.9 years in Weatherford.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $47,851 in Weatherford.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 28.0% in Weatherford.
  • Weatherford has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.5% in Weatherford.

Demographics

Demographics Weatherford vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Weatherford Sterling heights
Black 3 6
White 66 79
Asian 2 9
Hispanic 14 2
Two or More Races 11 4
American Indian 4 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Weatherford vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Weatherford.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 66% in Weatherford.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Weatherford.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Weatherford at 14% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Weatherford at 11% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Weatherford at 4% compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Weatherford Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 11.4%
Depression 25.5% 25.5%
Smoking 18.6% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 14.4% 17.7%
Obesity 44.1% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Weatherford vs Sterling heights

  • More residents in Weatherford report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Both cities have comparable depression rates at 25.5%.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 14.4% in Weatherford.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Weatherford at 44.1% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Weatherford and Sterling heights at 13.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Weatherford Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.4% (48) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 9.1% (1,082) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 5.2% (621) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.9% (2,246) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Weatherford vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.4% in Weatherford.
  • In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 9.1% in Weatherford.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 5.2% in Weatherford.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 18.9% in Weatherford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.