Demographics details for Weatherford, OK vs Franklin, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Weatherford, OK vs Franklin, GA.
Data | Weatherford | Franklin |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,859 | 24,128 |
Median Age | 23.9 years | 40.9 years |
Median Income | $47,851 | $52,597 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Weatherford vs Franklin
- The population in Franklin is higher at 24,128, compared to 11,859 in Weatherford.
- The median age in Franklin is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 23.9 years in Weatherford.
- Franklin has a higher median income of $52,597, compared to $47,851 in Weatherford.
- In Franklin, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 28.0% in Weatherford.
- Weatherford has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Franklin.
- Franklin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Weatherford.
Demographics
Demographics Weatherford vs Franklin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Weatherford | Franklin |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 9 |
White | 66 | 81 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 14 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Weatherford vs Franklin
- In Franklin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Weatherford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Franklin at 81% compared to 66% in Weatherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Weatherford at 2% compared to 1% in Franklin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Weatherford at 14% compared to 5% in Franklin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Weatherford at 11% compared to 3% in Franklin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Weatherford at 4% compared to 1% in Franklin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Weatherford | Franklin |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.2% |
Depression | 25.5% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 19.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 44.1% | 37.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Weatherford vs Franklin
- More residents in Weatherford report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.1% in Franklin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Weatherford at 25.5% compared to 23.4% in Franklin.
- Franklin has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Franklin at 16.2% compared to 14.4% in Weatherford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Weatherford at 44.1% compared to 37.7% in Franklin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Franklin at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Weatherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Weatherford | Franklin |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (48) | 1.6% (394) |
High School Diploma | 9.1% (1,082) | 16.4% (3,969) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (621) | 23.7% (5,721) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (2,246) | 11.1% (2,688) |
Education Levels Comparison: Weatherford vs Franklin
- In Franklin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Weatherford.
- In Franklin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.4% compared to 9.1% in Weatherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Franklin at 23.7%, compared to 5.2% in Weatherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Weatherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 11.1% in Franklin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.