Demographics details for Weatherford, OK vs Colquitt, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Weatherford, OK vs Colquitt, GA.
Data | Weatherford | Colquitt |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,859 | 45,762 |
Median Age | 23.9 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $47,851 | $47,235 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 22% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Weatherford vs Colquitt
- The population in Colquitt is higher at 45,762, compared to 11,859 in Weatherford.
- The median age in Colquitt is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 23.9 years in Weatherford.
- Weatherford has a higher median income of $47,851 compared to $47,235 in Colquitt.
- In Colquitt, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 28.0% in Weatherford.
- The poverty level is higher in Colquitt at 22%, compared to 15% in Weatherford.
- Colquitt has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Weatherford.
Demographics
Demographics Weatherford vs Colquitt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Weatherford | Colquitt |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 23 |
White | 66 | 51 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 14 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Weatherford vs Colquitt
- In Colquitt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 3% in Weatherford.
- Weatherford has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 51% in Colquitt.
- The Asian population is larger in Weatherford at 2% compared to 1% in Colquitt.
- Colquitt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 14% in Weatherford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Weatherford at 11% compared to 4% in Colquitt.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Weatherford at 4% compared to 1% in Colquitt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Weatherford | Colquitt |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 15.3% |
Depression | 25.5% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 22.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 44.1% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Weatherford vs Colquitt
- In Colquitt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Weatherford at 25.5% compared to 22.4% in Colquitt.
- Colquitt has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Weatherford at 14.4% compared to 13.7% in Colquitt.
- Obesity rates are higher in Weatherford at 44.1% compared to 41.8% in Colquitt.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Colquitt at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Weatherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Weatherford | Colquitt |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (48) | 1.5% (678) |
High School Diploma | 9.1% (1,082) | 20.2% (9,244) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (621) | 26.2% (12,009) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (2,246) | 9.6% (4,394) |
Education Levels Comparison: Weatherford vs Colquitt
- In Colquitt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Weatherford.
- In Colquitt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 9.1% in Weatherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Colquitt at 26.2%, compared to 5.2% in Weatherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Weatherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 9.6% in Colquitt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.