Demographics details for Weatherford, OK vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Weatherford, OK vs Cochran, GA.
| Data | Weatherford | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,859 | 4,647 |
| Median Age | 23.9 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $47,851 | $31,326 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Weatherford vs Cochran
- In Weatherford, the population is higher at 11,859, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- The median age in Cochran is higher at 28.9 years, compared to 23.9 years in Weatherford.
- Weatherford has a higher median income of $47,851 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Weatherford at 28.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 15% in Weatherford.
- The unemployment rate in Weatherford is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Weatherford vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Weatherford | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 53 |
| White | 66 | 40 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Weatherford vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 3% in Weatherford.
- Weatherford has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- Both Weatherford and Cochran have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Weatherford at 14% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Weatherford at 11% compared to 3% in Cochran.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Weatherford at 4% compared to 0% in Cochran.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Weatherford | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 44.1% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Weatherford vs Cochran
- More residents in Weatherford report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.3% in Cochran.
- Depression is more prevalent in Weatherford at 25.5% compared to 21.8% in Cochran.
- Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Weatherford at 14.4% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Obesity rates are higher in Weatherford at 44.1% compared to 38.5% in Cochran.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Weatherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Weatherford | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (48) | 1.2% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (1,082) | 12.2% (569) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (621) | 15.1% (703) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (2,246) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Weatherford vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Weatherford.
- In Cochran, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.2% compared to 9.1% in Weatherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 5.2% in Weatherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Weatherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.