Demographics details for Weatherford, OK vs Charlotte, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Weatherford, OK vs Charlotte, TN.
Data | Weatherford | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,859 | 1,674 |
Median Age | 23.9 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $47,851 | $57,188 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Weatherford vs Charlotte
- In Weatherford, the population is higher at 11,859, compared to 1,674 in Charlotte.
- The median age in Charlotte is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 23.9 years in Weatherford.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $57,188, compared to $47,851 in Weatherford.
- In Charlotte, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 28.0% in Weatherford.
- Weatherford has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Weatherford.
Demographics
Demographics Weatherford vs Charlotte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Weatherford | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 6 |
White | 66 | 82 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 14 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
American Indian | 4 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Weatherford vs Charlotte
- In Charlotte, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Weatherford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Charlotte at 82% compared to 66% in Weatherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Weatherford at 2% compared to 0% in Charlotte.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Weatherford at 14% compared to 4% in Charlotte.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Weatherford at 11% compared to 6% in Charlotte.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Weatherford at 4% compared to 2% in Charlotte.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Weatherford | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.7% |
Depression | 25.5% | 28.8% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 44.1% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Weatherford vs Charlotte
- In Charlotte, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Charlotte at 28.8% versus 25.5% in Weatherford.
- Charlotte has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Charlotte at 16.0% compared to 14.4% in Weatherford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Weatherford at 44.1% compared to 38.9% in Charlotte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Charlotte at 27.0% compared to 13.0% in Weatherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Weatherford | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (48) | 0.4% (6) |
High School Diploma | 9.1% (1,082) | 25.3% (424) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (621) | 26.0% (436) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (2,246) | 9.9% (166) |
Education Levels Comparison: Weatherford vs Charlotte
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Weatherford and Charlotte at 0.4%.
- In Charlotte, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 9.1% in Weatherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Charlotte at 26.0%, compared to 5.2% in Weatherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Weatherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 9.9% in Charlotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.