Demographics details for Weatherford, OK vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Weatherford, OK vs Ash fork, AZ.
Data | Weatherford | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,859 | 466 |
Median Age | 23.9 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $47,851 | $79,861 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Weatherford vs Ash fork
- In Weatherford, the population is higher at 11,859, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- The median age in Ash fork is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 23.9 years in Weatherford.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861, compared to $47,851 in Weatherford.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 28.0% in Weatherford.
- Weatherford has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Weatherford.
Demographics
Demographics Weatherford vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Weatherford | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 66 | 79 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 14 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 15 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Weatherford vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Weatherford at 3% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ash fork at 79% compared to 66% in Weatherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Weatherford at 2% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Weatherford at 14% compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ash fork at 15%, compared to 11% in Weatherford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Weatherford at 4% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Weatherford | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.2% |
Depression | 25.5% | 21.4% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 19.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 44.1% | 30.6% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Weatherford vs Ash fork
- More residents in Weatherford report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.4% in Ash fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Weatherford at 25.5% compared to 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ash fork at 15.9% compared to 14.4% in Weatherford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Weatherford at 44.1% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 13.0% in Weatherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Weatherford | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (48) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 9.1% (1,082) | 13.1% (61) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (621) | 23.6% (110) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (2,246) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Weatherford vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Weatherford have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- In Ash fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 9.1% in Weatherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 5.2% in Weatherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Weatherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.