Demographics details for Waynesboro, MS vs Freeland, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waynesboro, MS vs Freeland, MI.
Data | Waynesboro | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,530 | 7,357 |
Median Age | 38.1 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $24,779 | $95,478 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 32% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Waynesboro vs Freeland
- The population in Freeland is higher at 7,357, compared to 4,530 in Waynesboro.
- Residents in Waynesboro have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 37.4 years in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $95,478, compared to $24,779 in Waynesboro.
- In Freeland, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 28.0% in Waynesboro.
- Waynesboro has a higher poverty level at 32% compared to 4% in Freeland.
- The unemployment rate in Waynesboro is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Freeland.
Demographics
Demographics Waynesboro vs Freeland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Waynesboro | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Black | 56 | 9 |
White | 39 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Waynesboro vs Freeland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waynesboro at 56% compared to 9% in Freeland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Freeland at 76% compared to 39% in Waynesboro.
- In Freeland, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Waynesboro.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Waynesboro and Freeland at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Freeland at 8%, compared to 0% in Waynesboro.
- In Freeland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Waynesboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Waynesboro | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.9% | 9.1% |
Depression | 23.4% | 20.4% |
Smoking | 29.6% | 14.2% |
Binge Drinking | 10.9% | 20.3% |
Obesity | 49.5% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 36.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waynesboro vs Freeland
- More residents in Waynesboro report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 14.5% in Freeland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waynesboro at 23.4% compared to 20.4% in Freeland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waynesboro at 29.6% compared to 14.2% in Freeland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeland at 20.3% compared to 10.9% in Waynesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waynesboro at 49.5% compared to 37.8% in Freeland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waynesboro at 36.0% compared to 4.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Waynesboro | Freeland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.7% (169) | 0.7% (51) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (826) | 13.8% (1,014) |
Less than High School | 23.4% (1,061) | 7.4% (542) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (679) | 21.8% (1,605) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waynesboro vs Freeland
- A higher percentage of residents in Waynesboro have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.7% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waynesboro hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 13.8% in Freeland.
- More residents in Waynesboro have less than a high school education at 23.4% compared to 7.4% in Freeland.
- In Freeland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 15.0% in Waynesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.