Demographics details for Waynesboro, GA vs Clinton, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waynesboro, GA vs Clinton, SC.
| Data | Waynesboro | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,635 | 7,554 |
| Median Age | 30.0 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $41,932 | $38,350 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Waynesboro vs Clinton
- The population in Clinton is higher at 7,554, compared to 5,635 in Waynesboro.
- The median age in Clinton is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 30.0 years in Waynesboro.
- Waynesboro has a higher median income of $41,932 compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waynesboro at 30.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- Waynesboro has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 18% in Clinton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Waynesboro and Clinton at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Waynesboro vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waynesboro | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 38 |
| White | 21 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waynesboro vs Clinton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waynesboro at 70% compared to 38% in Clinton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clinton at 55% compared to 21% in Waynesboro.
- In Clinton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Waynesboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waynesboro at 4% compared to 1% in Clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waynesboro at 5% compared to 4% in Clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waynesboro and Clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waynesboro | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.1% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waynesboro vs Clinton
- More residents in Waynesboro report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.1% in Clinton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clinton at 23.7% versus 20.6% in Waynesboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waynesboro at 22.9% compared to 22.0% in Clinton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clinton at 15.8% compared to 12.1% in Waynesboro.
- Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 44.2% in Waynesboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Waynesboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waynesboro | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (119) | 1.0% (74) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (966) | 19.3% (1,460) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (416) | 15.6% (1,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.9% (499) | 17.3% (1,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waynesboro vs Clinton
- A higher percentage of residents in Waynesboro have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.0% in Clinton.
- In Clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 17.1% in Waynesboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clinton at 15.6%, compared to 7.4% in Waynesboro.
- In Clinton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 8.9% in Waynesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.