Demographics details for Waxhaw, NC vs Clinton, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waxhaw, NC vs Clinton, SC.
| Data | Waxhaw | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,533 | 7,554 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $124,711 | $38,350 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Waxhaw vs Clinton
- In Waxhaw, the population is higher at 22,533, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- Residents in Waxhaw have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Waxhaw has a higher median income of $124,711 compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waxhaw at 41.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Clinton at 18%, compared to 4% in Waxhaw.
- Clinton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Waxhaw.
Demographics
Demographics Waxhaw vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waxhaw | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 38 |
| White | 70 | 55 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waxhaw vs Clinton
- In Clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 8% in Waxhaw.
- Waxhaw has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 55% in Clinton.
- The Asian population is larger in Waxhaw at 5% compared to 2% in Clinton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waxhaw at 9% compared to 1% in Clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waxhaw at 8% compared to 4% in Clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waxhaw and Clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waxhaw | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 29.3% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waxhaw vs Clinton
- In Clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 13.4% in Waxhaw.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clinton at 23.7% versus 21.1% in Waxhaw.
- Clinton has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Waxhaw.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waxhaw at 18.9% compared to 15.8% in Clinton.
- Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 29.3% in Waxhaw.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 5.0% in Waxhaw.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waxhaw | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (58) | 1.0% (74) |
| High School Diploma | 7.6% (1,708) | 19.3% (1,460) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (785) | 15.6% (1,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.3% (6,610) | 17.3% (1,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waxhaw vs Clinton
- In Clinton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Waxhaw.
- In Clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 7.6% in Waxhaw.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clinton at 15.6%, compared to 3.5% in Waxhaw.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waxhaw hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.3% compared to 17.3% in Clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.