Demographics details for Waxahachie, TX vs Woodstock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waxahachie, TX vs Woodstock, VA.
Data | Waxahachie | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Population | 45,476 | 5,907 |
Median Age | 31.9 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $80,044 | $64,470 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Waxahachie vs Woodstock
- In Waxahachie, the population is higher at 45,476, compared to 5,907 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 31.9 years in Waxahachie.
- Waxahachie has a higher median income of $80,044 compared to $64,470 in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waxahachie at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodstock at 10%, compared to 9% in Waxahachie.
- The unemployment rate in Waxahachie is higher at 4.6%, compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Waxahachie vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Waxahachie | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Black | 16 | 6 |
White | 53 | 60 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 22 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waxahachie vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waxahachie at 16% compared to 6% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 60% compared to 53% in Waxahachie.
- In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Waxahachie.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waxahachie at 22% compared to 19% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 11%, compared to 8% in Waxahachie.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waxahachie and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Waxahachie | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 12.3% |
Depression | 23.5% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 16.8% | 18.2% |
Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waxahachie vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.3% in Waxahachie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 24.9% versus 23.5% in Waxahachie.
- Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 16.8% in Waxahachie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waxahachie at 18.7% compared to 16.2% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 38.1% in Waxahachie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Waxahachie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Waxahachie | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (823) | 2.0% (118) |
High School Diploma | 12.6% (5,721) | 19.0% (1,121) |
Less than High School | 10.3% (4,683) | 17.2% (1,018) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (7,149) | 16.4% (968) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waxahachie vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.8% in Waxahachie.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 12.6% in Waxahachie.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 17.2%, compared to 10.3% in Waxahachie.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 15.7% in Waxahachie.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.