Demographics details for Waxahachie, TX vs Roaring spring, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Waxahachie, TX vs Roaring spring, PA.

Data Waxahachie Roaring spring
Population 45,476 2,333
Median Age 31.9 years 36.1 years
Median Income $80,044 $63,194
Married Families 35.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 9% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 5.0

Population Comparison: Waxahachie vs Roaring spring

  • In Waxahachie, the population is higher at 45,476, compared to 2,333 in Roaring spring.
  • The median age in Roaring spring is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 31.9 years in Waxahachie.
  • Waxahachie has a higher median income of $80,044 compared to $63,194 in Roaring spring.
  • In Roaring spring, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 35.0% in Waxahachie.
  • The poverty level is higher in Roaring spring at 10%, compared to 9% in Waxahachie.
  • Roaring spring has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.6% in Waxahachie.

Demographics

Demographics Waxahachie vs Roaring spring provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Waxahachie Roaring spring
Black 16 1
White 53 91
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 22 3
Two or More Races 8 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Waxahachie vs Roaring spring

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waxahachie at 16% compared to 1% in Roaring spring.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Roaring spring at 91% compared to 53% in Waxahachie.
  • The Asian population is larger in Waxahachie at 1% compared to 0% in Roaring spring.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Waxahachie at 22% compared to 3% in Roaring spring.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Waxahachie at 8% compared to 5% in Roaring spring.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waxahachie and Roaring spring at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Waxahachie Roaring spring
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 18.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 12.2%
Depression 23.5% 25.5%
Smoking 16.8% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 18.5%
Obesity 38.1% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Waxahachie vs Roaring spring

  • In Roaring spring, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.3% in Waxahachie.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Roaring spring at 25.5% versus 23.5% in Waxahachie.
  • Roaring spring has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 16.8% in Waxahachie.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Waxahachie at 18.7% compared to 18.5% in Roaring spring.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Waxahachie at 38.1% compared to 34.7% in Roaring spring.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roaring spring at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Waxahachie.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Waxahachie Roaring spring
No Schooling 1.8% (823) 0.4% (9)
High School Diploma 12.6% (5,721) 25.9% (605)
Less than High School 10.3% (4,683) 7.2% (168)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.7% (7,149) 13.5% (316)

Education Levels Comparison: Waxahachie vs Roaring spring

  • A higher percentage of residents in Waxahachie have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.4% in Roaring spring.
  • In Roaring spring, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 12.6% in Waxahachie.
  • More residents in Waxahachie have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 7.2% in Roaring spring.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waxahachie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 13.5% in Roaring spring.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.