Demographics details for Waxahachie, TX vs Firth, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waxahachie, TX vs Firth, NE.
| Data | Waxahachie | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,476 | 654 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $80,044 | $86,042 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Waxahachie vs Firth
- In Waxahachie, the population is higher at 45,476, compared to 654 in Firth.
- The median age in Firth is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 31.9 years in Waxahachie.
- Firth has a higher median income of $86,042, compared to $80,044 in Waxahachie.
- In Firth, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Waxahachie.
- Waxahachie has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Firth.
- The unemployment rate in Waxahachie is higher at 4.6%, compared to 2.5% in Firth.
Demographics
Demographics Waxahachie vs Firth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waxahachie | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | Data is updating |
| White | 53 | 85 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 22 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waxahachie vs Firth
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waxahachie at 16% compared to 0% in Firth.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Firth at 85% compared to 53% in Waxahachie.
- Both Waxahachie and Firth have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waxahachie at 22% compared to 8% in Firth.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waxahachie at 8% compared to 6% in Firth.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waxahachie and Firth at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waxahachie | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 12.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 7.0% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 11.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 24.1% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waxahachie vs Firth
- More residents in Waxahachie report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 12.3% in Firth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waxahachie at 23.5% compared to 17.9% in Firth.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waxahachie at 16.8% compared to 11.4% in Firth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Firth at 24.1% compared to 18.7% in Waxahachie.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waxahachie at 38.1% compared to 31.5% in Firth.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waxahachie at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Firth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waxahachie | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (823) | 3.2% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (5,721) | 9.2% (60) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (4,683) | 10.1% (66) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (7,149) | 12.5% (82) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waxahachie vs Firth
- In Firth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.8% in Waxahachie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waxahachie hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 9.2% in Firth.
- More residents in Waxahachie have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 10.1% in Firth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waxahachie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 12.5% in Firth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.