Demographics details for Waverly, TN vs Roanoke rapids, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Waverly, TN vs Roanoke rapids, NC.

Data Waverly Roanoke rapids
Population 4,297 14,856
Median Age 46.7 years 40.5 years
Median Income $43,750 $45,732
Married Families 35.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 12% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.8

Population Comparison: Waverly vs Roanoke rapids

  • The population in Roanoke rapids is higher at 14,856, compared to 4,297 in Waverly.
  • Residents in Waverly have a higher median age of 46.7 years compared to 40.5 years in Roanoke rapids.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher median income of $45,732, compared to $43,750 in Waverly.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Waverly at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Roanoke rapids.
  • The poverty level is higher in Roanoke rapids at 18%, compared to 12% in Waverly.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.5% in Waverly.

Demographics

Demographics Waverly vs Roanoke rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Waverly Roanoke rapids
Black 2 35
White 91 50
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 2 6
Two or More Races 5 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Waverly vs Roanoke rapids

  • In Roanoke rapids, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 2% in Waverly.
  • Waverly has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 50% in Roanoke rapids.
  • In Roanoke rapids, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Waverly.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Waverly.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Roanoke rapids at 7%, compared to 5% in Waverly.
  • In Roanoke rapids, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Waverly.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Waverly Roanoke rapids
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.9% 13.6%
Depression 28.8% 24.6%
Smoking 23.6% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 15.1%
Obesity 37.8% 39.1%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Waverly vs Roanoke rapids

  • More residents in Waverly report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.5% in Roanoke rapids.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Waverly at 28.8% compared to 24.6% in Roanoke rapids.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Waverly at 23.6% compared to 21.4% in Roanoke rapids.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Waverly at 15.6% compared to 15.1% in Roanoke rapids.
  • Roanoke rapids has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 37.8% in Waverly.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roanoke rapids at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Waverly.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Waverly Roanoke rapids
No Schooling 1.0% (41) 0.6% (93)
High School Diploma 18.4% (792) 20.5% (3,040)
Less than High School 21.9% (943) 14.5% (2,156)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.5% (709) 15.7% (2,326)

Education Levels Comparison: Waverly vs Roanoke rapids

  • A higher percentage of residents in Waverly have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Roanoke rapids.
  • In Roanoke rapids, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 18.4% in Waverly.
  • More residents in Waverly have less than a high school education at 21.9% compared to 14.5% in Roanoke rapids.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waverly hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 15.7% in Roanoke rapids.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.