Demographics details for Waverly, TN vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waverly, TN vs Friendship, WI.
| Data | Waverly | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,297 | 681 |
| Median Age | 46.7 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $43,750 | $45,208 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Waverly vs Friendship
- In Waverly, the population is higher at 4,297, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 46.7 years in Waverly.
- Friendship has a higher median income of $45,208, compared to $43,750 in Waverly.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waverly at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- The poverty level is identical in both Waverly and Friendship at 12%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Waverly and Friendship at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Waverly vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waverly | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 91 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Waverly vs Friendship
- In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Waverly.
- Waverly has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 84% in Friendship.
- Both Waverly and Friendship have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waverly at 2% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friendship at 9%, compared to 5% in Waverly.
- In Friendship, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Waverly.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waverly | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 23.6% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waverly vs Friendship
- More residents in Waverly report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waverly at 28.8% compared to 24.3% in Friendship.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waverly at 23.6% compared to 21.6% in Friendship.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 15.6% in Waverly.
- Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 37.8% in Waverly.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waverly at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Friendship.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waverly | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (41) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (792) | 26.9% (183) |
| Less than High School | 21.9% (943) | 26.0% (177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (709) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waverly vs Friendship
- A higher percentage of residents in Waverly have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 18.4% in Waverly.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 21.9% in Waverly.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waverly hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.