Demographics details for Waukegan, IL vs Fort payne, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waukegan, IL vs Fort payne, AL.
Data | Waukegan | Fort payne |
---|---|---|
Population | 87,976 | 14,879 |
Median Age | 34.5 years | 39.7 years |
Median Income | $66,077 | $44,549 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Waukegan vs Fort payne
- In Waukegan, the population is higher at 87,976, compared to 14,879 in Fort payne.
- The median age in Fort payne is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 34.5 years in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has a higher median income of $66,077 compared to $44,549 in Fort payne.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Fort payne.
- The unemployment rate in Waukegan is higher at 6.4%, compared to 2.5% in Fort payne.
Demographics
Demographics Waukegan vs Fort payne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Waukegan | Fort payne |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 2 |
White | 2 | 72 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 54 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Waukegan vs Fort payne
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waukegan at 18% compared to 2% in Fort payne.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort payne at 72% compared to 2% in Waukegan.
- The Asian population is larger in Waukegan at 7% compared to 0% in Fort payne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waukegan at 54% compared to 20% in Fort payne.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waukegan at 18% compared to 4% in Fort payne.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Waukegan.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Waukegan | Fort payne |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 21.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 16.1% |
Depression | 17.9% | 26.0% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 23.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 14.3% |
Obesity | 39.3% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waukegan vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 16.6% in Waukegan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort payne at 26.0% versus 17.9% in Waukegan.
- Fort payne has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 18.0% in Waukegan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waukegan at 15.2% compared to 14.3% in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 39.3% in Waukegan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort payne at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Waukegan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Waukegan | Fort payne |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.1% (2,711) | 2.7% (402) |
High School Diploma | 16.5% (14,503) | 14.2% (2,110) |
Less than High School | 27.1% (23,842) | 27.9% (4,155) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (12,220) | 11.9% (1,767) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waukegan vs Fort payne
- A higher percentage of residents in Waukegan have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.7% in Fort payne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waukegan hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 14.2% in Fort payne.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort payne at 27.9%, compared to 27.1% in Waukegan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waukegan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 11.9% in Fort payne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.