Demographics details for Waukegan, IL vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waukegan, IL vs Beaver dam, WI.
| Data | Waukegan | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87,976 | 16,582 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $66,077 | $65,802 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Waukegan vs Beaver dam
- In Waukegan, the population is higher at 87,976, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
- The median age in Beaver dam is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 34.5 years in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has a higher median income of $66,077 compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Waukegan and Beaver dam at 35.0%.
- Waukegan has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate in Waukegan is higher at 6.4%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Waukegan vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waukegan | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 3 |
| White | 2 | 81 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 54 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waukegan vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waukegan at 18% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 2% in Waukegan.
- The Asian population is larger in Waukegan at 7% compared to 2% in Beaver dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waukegan at 54% compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waukegan at 18% compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Waukegan at 1% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waukegan | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waukegan vs Beaver dam
- More residents in Waukegan report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beaver dam at 23.6% versus 17.9% in Waukegan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waukegan at 18.0% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 15.2% in Waukegan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waukegan at 39.3% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Waukegan and Beaver dam at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waukegan | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (2,711) | 0.3% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 16.5% (14,503) | 23.8% (3,947) |
| Less than High School | 27.1% (23,842) | 10.3% (1,706) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (12,220) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waukegan vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Waukegan have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 16.5% in Waukegan.
- More residents in Waukegan have less than a high school education at 27.1% compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 13.9% in Waukegan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.