Demographics details for Wauconda, IL vs Scandia, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wauconda, IL vs Scandia, KS.
Data | Wauconda | Scandia |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,932 | 338 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 48.6 years |
Median Income | $108,229 | $49,219 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Wauconda vs Scandia
- In Wauconda, the population is higher at 13,932, compared to 338 in Scandia.
- The median age in Scandia is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 36.8 years in Wauconda.
- Wauconda has a higher median income of $108,229 compared to $49,219 in Scandia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wauconda at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Scandia.
- The poverty level is higher in Scandia at 15%, compared to 8% in Wauconda.
- The unemployment rate in Wauconda is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Scandia.
Demographics
Demographics Wauconda vs Scandia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wauconda | Scandia |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 66 | 90 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 18 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wauconda vs Scandia
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Wauconda and Scandia at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Scandia at 90% compared to 66% in Wauconda.
- The Asian population is larger in Wauconda at 6% compared to 0% in Scandia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wauconda at 18% compared to 0% in Scandia.
- Both Wauconda and Scandia have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wauconda and Scandia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wauconda | Scandia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 9.7% |
Depression | 18.8% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 16.9% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 20.3% |
Obesity | 31.0% | 37.5% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wauconda vs Scandia
- In Scandia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.2% in Wauconda.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Scandia at 20.9% versus 18.8% in Wauconda.
- Scandia has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 12.7% in Wauconda.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Scandia at 20.3% compared to 18.8% in Wauconda.
- Scandia has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 31.0% in Wauconda.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scandia at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Wauconda.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wauconda | Scandia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (202) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 10.5% (1,456) | 14.5% (49) |
Less than High School | 10.2% (1,425) | 10.7% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.0% (3,623) | 18.6% (63) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wauconda vs Scandia
- A higher percentage of residents in Wauconda have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Scandia.
- In Scandia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 10.5% in Wauconda.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Scandia at 10.7%, compared to 10.2% in Wauconda.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wauconda hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 18.6% in Scandia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.