Demographics details for Wauconda, IL vs Mcpherson, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wauconda, IL vs Mcpherson, KS.
| Data | Wauconda | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,932 | 13,865 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $108,229 | $69,807 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Wauconda vs Mcpherson
- In Wauconda, the population is higher at 13,932, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- Residents in Wauconda have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Wauconda has a higher median income of $108,229 compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Wauconda and Mcpherson at 43.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcpherson at 9%, compared to 8% in Wauconda.
- The unemployment rate in Wauconda is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Wauconda vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wauconda | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 66 | 87 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wauconda vs Mcpherson
- In Mcpherson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Wauconda.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mcpherson at 87% compared to 66% in Wauconda.
- The Asian population is larger in Wauconda at 6% compared to 1% in Mcpherson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wauconda at 18% compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wauconda at 9% compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wauconda and Mcpherson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wauconda | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wauconda vs Mcpherson
- In Mcpherson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.2% in Wauconda.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mcpherson at 20.1% versus 18.8% in Wauconda.
- Mcpherson has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 12.7% in Wauconda.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wauconda at 18.8% compared to 18.2% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 31.0% in Wauconda.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Wauconda.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wauconda | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (202) | 0.3% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 10.5% (1,456) | 12.8% (1,775) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (1,425) | 5.8% (804) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.0% (3,623) | 21.7% (3,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wauconda vs Mcpherson
- A higher percentage of residents in Wauconda have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Mcpherson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 10.5% in Wauconda.
- More residents in Wauconda have less than a high school education at 10.2% compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wauconda hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.