Demographics details for Watertown, SD vs Grand junction, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Watertown, SD vs Grand junction, CO.

Data Watertown Grand junction
Population 23,019 68,034
Median Age 38.9 years 39.9 years
Median Income $61,320 $62,993
Married Families 40.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Watertown vs Grand junction

  • The population in Grand junction is higher at 68,034, compared to 23,019 in Watertown.
  • The median age in Grand junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 38.9 years in Watertown.
  • Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993, compared to $61,320 in Watertown.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Watertown at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Watertown and Grand junction at 10%.
  • Grand junction has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.5% in Watertown.

Demographics

Demographics Watertown vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Watertown Grand junction
Black 1 1
White 87 73
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 4 16
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian 3 1

Demographics Comparison: Watertown vs Grand junction

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Watertown and Grand junction at 1%.
  • Watertown has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
  • Both Watertown and Grand junction have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 4% in Watertown.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand junction at 8%, compared to 4% in Watertown.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Watertown at 3% compared to 1% in Grand junction.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Watertown Grand junction
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 11.8%
Depression 20.1% 24.5%
Smoking 18.3% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 20.1% 19.2%
Obesity 37.2% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Watertown vs Grand junction

  • In Grand junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.4% in Watertown.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Grand junction at 24.5% versus 20.1% in Watertown.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Watertown at 18.3% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Watertown at 20.1% compared to 19.2% in Grand junction.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Watertown at 37.2% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Watertown.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Watertown Grand junction
No Schooling 1.6% (364) 0.4% (245)
High School Diploma 23.1% (5,313) 13.9% (9,476)
Less than High School 11.9% (2,738) 9.7% (6,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.7% (3,162) 23.8% (16,201)

Education Levels Comparison: Watertown vs Grand junction

  • A higher percentage of residents in Watertown have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Watertown hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • More residents in Watertown have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
  • In Grand junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 13.7% in Watertown.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.