Demographics details for Watertown, SD vs Gardner, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Watertown, SD vs Gardner, MA.
| Data | Watertown | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,019 | 20,902 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $61,320 | $56,974 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Watertown vs Gardner
- In Watertown, the population is higher at 23,019, compared to 20,902 in Gardner.
- The median age in Gardner is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 38.9 years in Watertown.
- Watertown has a higher median income of $61,320 compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Watertown at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- Watertown has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Gardner.
- Gardner has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Watertown.
Demographics
Demographics Watertown vs Gardner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Watertown | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 87 | 82 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Watertown vs Gardner
- In Gardner, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Watertown.
- Watertown has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 82% in Gardner.
- In Gardner, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Watertown.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 4% in Watertown.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gardner at 5%, compared to 4% in Watertown.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Watertown at 3% compared to 0% in Gardner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Watertown | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Watertown vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 13.4% in Watertown.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gardner at 24.4% versus 20.1% in Watertown.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Watertown at 18.3% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Watertown at 20.1% compared to 17.6% in Gardner.
- Obesity rates are higher in Watertown at 37.2% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Watertown.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Watertown | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (364) | 1.3% (276) |
| High School Diploma | 23.1% (5,313) | 21.5% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (2,738) | 16.8% (3,513) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (3,162) | 15.0% (3,133) |
Education Levels Comparison: Watertown vs Gardner
- A higher percentage of residents in Watertown have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.3% in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Watertown hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 21.5% in Gardner.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardner at 16.8%, compared to 11.9% in Watertown.
- In Gardner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 13.7% in Watertown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.