Demographics details for Waterproof, LA vs New holland, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Waterproof, LA vs New holland, OH.

Data Waterproof New holland
Population 499 822
Median Age 37.0 years 40.4 years
Median Income $21,953 $44,167
Married Families 9.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 30% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.2

Population Comparison: Waterproof vs New holland

  • The population in New holland is higher at 822, compared to 499 in Waterproof.
  • The median age in New holland is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 37.0 years in Waterproof.
  • New holland has a higher median income of $44,167, compared to $21,953 in Waterproof.
  • In New holland, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 9.0% in Waterproof.
  • Waterproof has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 12% in New holland.
  • The unemployment rate in Waterproof is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in New holland.

Demographics

Demographics Waterproof vs New holland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Waterproof New holland
Black 103 2
White -12 93
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 2
Two or More Races 2 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Waterproof vs New holland

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waterproof at 103% compared to 2% in New holland.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in New holland at 93% compared to -12% in Waterproof.
  • The Asian population is larger in Waterproof at 7% compared to 0% in New holland.
  • New holland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Waterproof.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New holland at 3%, compared to 2% in Waterproof.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterproof and New holland at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Waterproof New holland
Mental Health Not Good 24.5% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 20.0% 12.0%
Depression 25.1% 24.3%
Smoking 33.7% 21.3%
Binge Drinking 11.8% 18.8%
Obesity 53.1% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Waterproof vs New holland

  • More residents in Waterproof report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 17.6% in New holland.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Waterproof at 25.1% compared to 24.3% in New holland.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Waterproof at 33.7% compared to 21.3% in New holland.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in New holland at 18.8% compared to 11.8% in Waterproof.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Waterproof at 53.1% compared to 41.8% in New holland.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New holland at 24.0% compared to 22.0% in Waterproof.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Waterproof New holland
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (8)
High School Diploma 27.7% (138) 25.2% (207)
Less than High School 10.6% (53) 30.2% (248)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.8% (64) 5.2% (43)

Education Levels Comparison: Waterproof vs New holland

  • In New holland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Waterproof.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waterproof hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 25.2% in New holland.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New holland at 30.2%, compared to 10.6% in Waterproof.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waterproof hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 5.2% in New holland.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.