Demographics details for Waterproof, LA vs Muscadine, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Waterproof, LA vs Muscadine, AL.

Data Waterproof Muscadine
Population 499 104
Median Age 37.0 years 38.0 years
Median Income $21,953 $50,000
Married Families 9.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 30% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Waterproof vs Muscadine

  • In Waterproof, the population is higher at 499, compared to 104 in Muscadine.
  • The median age in Muscadine is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 37.0 years in Waterproof.
  • Muscadine has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $21,953 in Waterproof.
  • In Muscadine, the percentage of married families is higher at 20.0%, compared to 9.0% in Waterproof.
  • Waterproof has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 12% in Muscadine.
  • The unemployment rate in Waterproof is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Muscadine.

Demographics

Demographics Waterproof vs Muscadine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Waterproof Muscadine
Black 103 15
White -12 80
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 5
Two or More Races 2 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Waterproof vs Muscadine

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waterproof at 103% compared to 15% in Muscadine.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Muscadine at 80% compared to -12% in Waterproof.
  • The Asian population is larger in Waterproof at 7% compared to 0% in Muscadine.
  • Muscadine has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Waterproof.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Waterproof at 2% compared to 0% in Muscadine.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterproof and Muscadine at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Waterproof Muscadine
Mental Health Not Good 24.5% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 20.0% Data is updating%
Depression 25.1% Data is updating%
Smoking 33.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 11.8% Data is updating%
Obesity 53.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 22.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Waterproof vs Muscadine

  • More residents in Waterproof report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Waterproof at 25.1% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Waterproof at 33.7% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Waterproof at 11.8% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Waterproof at 53.1% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Waterproof at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Waterproof Muscadine
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 27.7% (138) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 10.6% (53) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.8% (64) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Waterproof vs Muscadine

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Waterproof and Muscadine at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waterproof hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • More residents in Waterproof have less than a high school education at 10.6% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waterproof hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.