Demographics details for Waterproof, LA vs Klamath falls, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterproof, LA vs Klamath falls, OR.
| Data | Waterproof | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 499 | 21,977 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $21,953 | $46,695 |
| Married Families | 9.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Waterproof vs Klamath falls
- The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 499 in Waterproof.
- Residents in Waterproof have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher median income of $46,695, compared to $21,953 in Waterproof.
- In Klamath falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 9.0% in Waterproof.
- Waterproof has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 18% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 5.0% in Waterproof.
Demographics
Demographics Waterproof vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterproof | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 103 | 1 |
| White | -12 | 69 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Waterproof vs Klamath falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waterproof at 103% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Klamath falls at 69% compared to -12% in Waterproof.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterproof at 7% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Waterproof.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 2% in Waterproof.
- In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Waterproof.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterproof | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 24.5% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 20.0% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 33.7% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 53.1% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterproof vs Klamath falls
- More residents in Waterproof report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 20.2% in Klamath falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 25.1% in Waterproof.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waterproof at 33.7% compared to 19.9% in Klamath falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Klamath falls at 15.8% compared to 11.8% in Waterproof.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waterproof at 53.1% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waterproof at 22.0% compared to 20.0% in Klamath falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterproof | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (192) |
| High School Diploma | 27.7% (138) | 16.0% (3,508) |
| Less than High School | 10.6% (53) | 15.5% (3,401) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (64) | 14.4% (3,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterproof vs Klamath falls
- In Klamath falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Waterproof.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterproof hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Klamath falls at 15.5%, compared to 10.6% in Waterproof.
- In Klamath falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 12.8% in Waterproof.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.