Demographics details for Waterproof, LA vs Garden city, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Waterproof, LA vs Garden city, MI.

Data Waterproof Garden city
Population 499 26,815
Median Age 37.0 years 40.9 years
Median Income $21,953 $63,630
Married Families 9.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 30% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.2

Population Comparison: Waterproof vs Garden city

  • The population in Garden city is higher at 26,815, compared to 499 in Waterproof.
  • The median age in Garden city is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 37.0 years in Waterproof.
  • Garden city has a higher median income of $63,630, compared to $21,953 in Waterproof.
  • In Garden city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 9.0% in Waterproof.
  • Waterproof has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 12% in Garden city.
  • The unemployment rate in Waterproof is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in Garden city.

Demographics

Demographics Waterproof vs Garden city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Waterproof Garden city
Black 103 6
White -12 82
Asian 7 1
Hispanic Data is updating 5
Two or More Races 2 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Waterproof vs Garden city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waterproof at 103% compared to 6% in Garden city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Garden city at 82% compared to -12% in Waterproof.
  • The Asian population is larger in Waterproof at 7% compared to 1% in Garden city.
  • Garden city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Waterproof.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garden city at 6%, compared to 2% in Waterproof.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterproof and Garden city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Waterproof Garden city
Mental Health Not Good 24.5% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 20.0% 11.6%
Depression 25.1% 25.2%
Smoking 33.7% 21.5%
Binge Drinking 11.8% 19.7%
Obesity 53.1% 32.1%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Waterproof vs Garden city

  • More residents in Waterproof report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 17.7% in Garden city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Garden city at 25.2% versus 25.1% in Waterproof.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Waterproof at 33.7% compared to 21.5% in Garden city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Garden city at 19.7% compared to 11.8% in Waterproof.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Waterproof at 53.1% compared to 32.1% in Garden city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Waterproof at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Garden city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Waterproof Garden city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.1% (294)
High School Diploma 27.7% (138) 22.7% (6,076)
Less than High School 10.6% (53) 12.9% (3,455)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.8% (64) 10.2% (2,739)

Education Levels Comparison: Waterproof vs Garden city

  • In Garden city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Waterproof.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waterproof hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 22.7% in Garden city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garden city at 12.9%, compared to 10.6% in Waterproof.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waterproof hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 10.2% in Garden city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.