Demographics details for Waterproof, LA vs Elk grove, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterproof, LA vs Elk grove, CA.
| Data | Waterproof | Elk grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 499 | 177,558 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $21,953 | $115,864 |
| Married Families | 9.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Waterproof vs Elk grove
- The population in Elk grove is higher at 177,558, compared to 499 in Waterproof.
- The median age in Elk grove is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 37.0 years in Waterproof.
- Elk grove has a higher median income of $115,864, compared to $21,953 in Waterproof.
- In Elk grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 9.0% in Waterproof.
- Waterproof has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 10% in Elk grove.
- The unemployment rate in Waterproof is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.4% in Elk grove.
Demographics
Demographics Waterproof vs Elk grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterproof | Elk grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 103 | 11 |
| White | -12 | 27 |
| Asian | 7 | 30 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterproof vs Elk grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waterproof at 103% compared to 11% in Elk grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Elk grove at 27% compared to -12% in Waterproof.
- In Elk grove, the Asian population stands at 30%, greater than 7% in Waterproof.
- Elk grove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 0% in Waterproof.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Elk grove at 13%, compared to 2% in Waterproof.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterproof and Elk grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterproof | Elk grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 24.5% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 20.0% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 33.7% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 53.1% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterproof vs Elk grove
- More residents in Waterproof report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 14.7% in Elk grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waterproof at 25.1% compared to 17.0% in Elk grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waterproof at 33.7% compared to 10.7% in Elk grove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Elk grove at 15.1% compared to 11.8% in Waterproof.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waterproof at 53.1% compared to 28.2% in Elk grove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waterproof at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Elk grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterproof | Elk grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.3% (4,155) |
| High School Diploma | 27.7% (138) | 10.0% (17,736) |
| Less than High School | 10.6% (53) | 8.6% (15,291) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (64) | 24.3% (43,172) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterproof vs Elk grove
- In Elk grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Waterproof.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterproof hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 10.0% in Elk grove.
- More residents in Waterproof have less than a high school education at 10.6% compared to 8.6% in Elk grove.
- In Elk grove, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.3% compared to 12.8% in Waterproof.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.