Demographics details for Waterman, IL vs Water valley, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterman, IL vs Water valley, MS.
Data | Waterman | Water valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,427 | 3,361 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $87,292 | $45,718 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Waterman vs Water valley
- The population in Water valley is higher at 3,361, compared to 1,427 in Waterman.
- Residents in Waterman have a higher median age of 36.2 years compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
- Waterman has a higher median income of $87,292 compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waterman at 50.0% compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
- Waterman has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- Water valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.1% in Waterman.
Demographics
Demographics Waterman vs Water valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Waterman | Water valley |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 49 |
White | 78 | 49 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterman vs Water valley
- In Water valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 2% in Waterman.
- Waterman has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 49% in Water valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterman at 1% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waterman at 10% compared to 2% in Water valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waterman at 9% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterman and Water valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Waterman | Water valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.8% |
Depression | 21.6% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 16.2% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 44.0% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterman vs Water valley
- In Water valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.0% in Waterman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Water valley at 22.0% versus 21.6% in Waterman.
- Water valley has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 16.2% in Waterman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waterman at 18.7% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
- Water valley has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 36.4% in Waterman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Water valley at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Waterman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Waterman | Water valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (34) |
High School Diploma | 22.6% (323) | 24.0% (805) |
Less than High School | 8.5% (122) | 13.0% (437) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (221) | 9.6% (322) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterman vs Water valley
- In Water valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Waterman.
- In Water valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 22.6% in Waterman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Water valley at 13.0%, compared to 8.5% in Waterman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.