Demographics details for Waterman, IL vs Sterling heights, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterman, IL vs Sterling heights, MI.
| Data | Waterman | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,427 | 132,567 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 41.2 years |
| Median Income | $87,292 | $75,381 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Waterman vs Sterling heights
- The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 1,427 in Waterman.
- The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 36.2 years in Waterman.
- Waterman has a higher median income of $87,292 compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waterman at 50.0% compared to 45.0% in Sterling heights.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling heights at 8%, compared to 6% in Waterman.
- Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.1% in Waterman.
Demographics
Demographics Waterman vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterman | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | 78 | 79 |
| Asian | 1 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterman vs Sterling heights
- In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Waterman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 78% in Waterman.
- In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Waterman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waterman at 10% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waterman at 9% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterman and Sterling heights at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterman | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterman vs Sterling heights
- In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.0% in Waterman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 21.6% in Waterman.
- Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 16.2% in Waterman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waterman at 18.7% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
- Sterling heights has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 36.4% in Waterman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Waterman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterman | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.4% (3,134) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (323) | 18.8% (24,937) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (122) | 16.6% (22,008) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (221) | 22.3% (29,518) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterman vs Sterling heights
- In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Waterman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterman hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 8.5% in Waterman.
- In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 15.5% in Waterman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.