Demographics details for Waterman, IL vs Interlachen, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Waterman, IL vs Interlachen, FL.

Data Waterman Interlachen
Population 1,427 1,457
Median Age 36.2 years 48.6 years
Median Income $87,292 $50,776
Married Families 50.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Waterman vs Interlachen

  • The population in Interlachen is higher at 1,457, compared to 1,427 in Waterman.
  • The median age in Interlachen is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 36.2 years in Waterman.
  • Waterman has a higher median income of $87,292 compared to $50,776 in Interlachen.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Waterman at 50.0% compared to 39.0% in Interlachen.
  • The poverty level is higher in Interlachen at 12%, compared to 6% in Waterman.
  • Interlachen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.1% in Waterman.

Demographics

Demographics Waterman vs Interlachen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Waterman Interlachen
Black 2 11
White 78 37
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 10 34
Two or More Races 9 18
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Waterman vs Interlachen

  • In Interlachen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 2% in Waterman.
  • Waterman has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 37% in Interlachen.
  • The Asian population is larger in Waterman at 1% compared to 0% in Interlachen.
  • Interlachen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 10% in Waterman.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Interlachen at 18%, compared to 9% in Waterman.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterman and Interlachen at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Waterman Interlachen
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 13.9%
Depression 21.6% 20.3%
Smoking 16.2% 24.5%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 16.7%
Obesity 36.4% 35.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Waterman vs Interlachen

  • In Interlachen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.0% in Waterman.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Waterman at 21.6% compared to 20.3% in Interlachen.
  • Interlachen has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 16.2% in Waterman.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Waterman at 18.7% compared to 16.7% in Interlachen.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Waterman at 36.4% compared to 35.5% in Interlachen.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Interlachen at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Waterman.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Waterman Interlachen
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.0% (29)
High School Diploma 22.6% (323) 22.0% (320)
Less than High School 8.5% (122) 41.7% (607)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.5% (221) 10.4% (151)

Education Levels Comparison: Waterman vs Interlachen

  • In Interlachen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Waterman.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waterman hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 22.0% in Interlachen.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Interlachen at 41.7%, compared to 8.5% in Waterman.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waterman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 10.4% in Interlachen.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.